So while some sticklers for "I couldn't care less" believe they are working against changing the phrase, it's a phrase that has gone through some changes already. Remember that the history of grammar usage is based on people in power.
If I feel compelled to say something, I might start with: The A. Since you are talking about multiple others "... We only use it in rather legalistic contexts:.
In some cases, using "data" as plural is legitimately useful. Amy Lightfoot started out doing a degree in psychology in 1995 and quickly became interested in the processes involved in learning languages. Look at this example: The two Bobs' book so others is plural.
There are two persons of interest being questioned for the murder of John Doe. Person, persons or people? Your sentence, "Their people are a bad lot" "lot" functions here as a singular count noun, and means "a group" seems to be the same structure as "The English people are a great people. I opt for positivity and assuming it was a fatigue error.
Besides using a people as the predicate nominative, you could also use other nouns such as "a group," "a team," or "a class," as in: No one is quite sure how "couldn't" became "could," but while some theorize that the "-n't" was dropped due to sloppy pronunciation, others wonder if the American version of the phrase was meant to be sarcastic.
And if you've ever tried to contort a sentence to avoid ending on a preposition, you might suspect that fetish is linguistic masochism. Table of contents. It would be better to write "I have checked all of my students' paper s ". Now, there are plenty of people who will offer perfectly logical explanations for why they feel "preventive" is more correct than "preventative.
Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?
Latin prepositions must always precede prepositional phrases; therefore, English prepositions must always precede prepositional phrases. But while some English grammarians, notably Henry Alford in his 1864 book The Queen's English , have argued against splitting infinitives, it is not a rule.
Occasionally, "persons" is preferred to "people," as in legal and quasi-legal language: But really, this is a style choice.
These non-rules are backed up by various grammarians and linguists. O'Conner writes, "It's time to admit that hopefully has joined the class of introductory words life fortunately, frankly, happily, honestly, sadly, seriously, and others that we use not to describe a verb, which is what adverbs usually do, but to describe our attitude toward the statement that follows.
Totally pointless. How do I use the words persons and peoples?